nanog mailing list archives

Re: paix palo attitude


From: "Paul Wall" <pauldotwall () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:22:31 -0400

IIJ had some empty space when I was there the other day, you should
ask them for a feed and some Us. :)

Seriously though, is the requirement to be physically plugged into the
fabric an important one?  Might some ebgp multihop feeds to a remote
route collector suffice?

Drive Slow,
Paul Wall

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
we're looking at dropping 2/3 of a rack of routing research measurement
kit into paix palo alto, and have some questions.  considering the price
of space and power, we want to kinda make sure we'll get the data we need.

we are looking specifically for a large amount of bgp peering data, we
hope that folk will give us bgp peering though we expect no in- or
out-bound traffic.  think analogously to route views, though the kit on
our end will be grinding the beans much more finely, espressoBGP :).

pnis are expensive.  if we plug into the peering mesh, are any larger
folk on it?

if not, would we be better off at the linx, at de-cix, at amsix, in
stockholm?

private replies are probably better as this is not of general interest.
 thanks.

randy




Current thread: