nanog mailing list archives

RE: OK, who's the idiot using tcwireless.us?


From: Skywing <Skywing () valhallalegends com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 20:28:58 -0500

The person responsible already posted about this about 4 hours ago, BTW; further speculation is obsolete. :)

- S

-----Original Message-----
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 9:11 PM
To: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: OK, who's the idiot using tcwireless.us?

Active address validation, perhaps?

Owen

On Oct 7, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greetings,

      I agree with Howard here, I don't think this is a mis-
configuration, but a harvest attempt.  The "mailserver" is in
different messages, and I can't see how that could get misconfigured
in a honest validation server.  My guess is that someone is trolling
the archives, and sending this back?  Why, I have no idea, given
they already can see the sending address.

      Chris

On 07 Oct 2008, at 13.14, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

Somebody on the NANOG mailing list has their mail pointing to
tcwireless.us,
which is throwing challenge/response mail like the following:


Your message

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
To: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: cnn.com - Homeland Security seeks cyber
counterattack system (
Einstein 3.0)
Date: 10/6/2008

has been just received by gmail.com mailserver.

To prove that your message was sent by a human and not a computer,
please
visit the URL below and type in the alphanumeric text you will see
in the
image. You will be asked to do this only once for this recipient.

http://mail.tcwireless.us/challenge/?folder=2008100614384085099427

Your message will be automatically deleted in a few days if you do
not
confirm this request.

=====================================================
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. NO ONE WILL RECEIVE IT.
=====================================================

Note it says 'gmail.com mailserver'.  Paul Ferguson reported to me
that the one
he saw said 'received by vt.edu mailserver'.  Also note that the
From/To
has lost nanog () nanog org - for both my note and Paul's (in fact,
looking at
Paul's actual posting and mine show nanog () nanog org as being the
only common
link, thus the "must be a nanog subscriber" conclusion).

Please, if you're going to use a C/R, at least learn how to
whitelist the
mailing lists you're on.  And if you can't figure out how to do
that, please
do us all a favor and not try to run an operational network...

- ---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCB67593B




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJI690kAAoJEGmx2Mt/+Iw/awkH/j/goIY2MuQYfMkGVCmBVlMx
vrFACJFUdM3kFSw1KuB5l0s7U62JIuxoCMkIFuEU1xtXQzNMbmYytlkIq/oNY31q
VEaEcG6khM7oxDrbbc4TgFVHm195o1mKYhK8TMPr5WBq9RIgY+n2iWFYfi/kIR0x
R5VgKG2LUFOJr2i/400X8UGbq5DJAbStJf7FrqIWAQCsgtEVPSSp/cMrjujG4iPD
1mH4x76q3RrrMfUpcELs/LAE55eBPMFXAUx4lk13QKVhp7xkK5lkQWlUvEOUQKmQ
zDCsj0Lu2sOPldZFszcKUQNuHQE3Bp8j3MNJ1vMBqSH2m+Gdh+Wwu3TRq8F1QaM=
=flGu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Current thread: