nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:24:25 +0100
* alh-ietf () tndh net (Tony Hain) [Wed 26 Nov 2008, 01:03 CET]:
In any case, content providers can avoid the confusion if they simply put up a local 6to4 router alongside their 2001:: prefix, and populate DNS with both. Longest match will cause 2001:: connected systems to chose that dst, while 6to4 connected systems will chose 2002:: as the dst. There is no need
Huh? Longest match done by web browsers and other applications? Since when?
-- Niels. -- "We humans get marks for consistency. We always opt for civilization after exhausting the alternatives." -- Carl Guderian
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Perry Lorier (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mohacsi Janos (Nov 20)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer (Nov 21)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 21)
- RE: IPv6 routing /48s Tony Hain (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Niels Bakker (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Niels Bakker (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Niels Bakker (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Niels Bakker (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Leo Bicknell (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Pekka Savola (Nov 18)