Re: Public Assertions

[Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz () wvi com>]

Can anyone explain why we are being exposed to this? From either side?

bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> >       On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
> >     > 	If I may...  I am in possesion of your certified letter 
> >     > 	-AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice
> >     >        that I have taken posession of said certified mail.
> >     > 
> >     > 	please get your facts straight, esp. when making formal 
> >     > 	replies to government inqueries.  it can only strengthen
> >     >        your case if you tell the truth.
> >
> > Equally but differently untruthful in my case.  Myself, I don't sit around 
> > my house all day, breathlessly anticipating a new missive from Dean.
> >
> >                                 -Bill
>
>         then what, pray tell, do you do to while away the hours?
>         knit? route IP datagrams? carve elaborate totems from ancient redwoods?
>         myself, I have taken up Portugese... such an expressive language.
>
> 	my instruction in the email above was derived from reading the submitted 
> 	comments to the DoC/NOI on securing the DNS.  telling us lies is one thing,
> 	factual mis-statements to the goverment is something else and i 
> 	fail to see how doing so helps ones cause.
>
>         in the event that anyone has doubts, I will be glad to scan and post
>         the evidence.  Dean, care to amend your statements?
>
>
> --bill


--
Jeff Shultz