nanog mailing list archives
RE: MPLS for IPv6
From: "Miya Kohno" <mkohno () juniper net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:01:59 +0800
Hi Julien,
If we consider the phases in terms of IPv6 deployment...., Ph-0: IPv4 only Ph-1: IPv4/v6 dual stack + v4/v6 coexistence technologies Ph-2: IPv6 onlyHmm, not quite. I'd say: v4 only v4/v6 dual stack, with v4 being primary (for network management, routing, etc) v4/v6 dual stack, with v6 primary v6 only
"A later phase of Ph-1" in my previous email corresponds to your "v4/v6 dual stack with v6 primary". And, putting aside whether if it's evil, a certain coexistence technologies would be needed for the phase transition. Miya
Current thread:
- MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Daniel Roesen (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Nathan Ward (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 07)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Julien Goodwin (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 10)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 10)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)