nanog mailing list archives
Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:57:21 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4 nov 2008, at 07.23, Paul Ferguson wrote:
I'm just wondering -- in globak scheme of security issue, is NTP security a major issue? Just curious.
Maybe not NTP per se but timing is. Best regards, - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkkS98IACgkQAFdZ6xrc/t5TFgCgsCtZvsgwdVvaJYflTLVPxI4D zpQAn39r49MJ3VKU4SrHCnYoVpqpU8Ej =chKQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey?, (continued)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Glen Kent (Nov 04)
- RE: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Lincoln Dale (Nov 04)
- RE: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Tony Finch (Nov 04)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 06)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 04)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? bmanning (Nov 04)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Glen Kent (Nov 04)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Ask Bjørn Hansen (Nov 15)
- Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Joe Greco (Nov 15)