nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:00:12 -0500
On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:46:27 PST, Scott Weeks said:
Are you saying that if any part of a network touches US soil it can be regulated by the US govt over the entirety of the network? For my part, this is not an attempt to change the subject or divert the argument (red herring). It is a valid question with operational impact.
Who owns the DNS root?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Scott Weeks (Nov 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Scott Weeks (Nov 05)
- Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Scott Weeks (Nov 05)
- RE: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sendingvs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) michael.dillon (Nov 05)
- Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sendingvs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Wayne E. Bouchard (Nov 05)
- Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Matthew Palmer (Nov 05)
- Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 05)
- RE: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sendingvs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) michael.dillon (Nov 05)