nanog mailing list archives
RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:42:23 -0500
At 06:54 PM 11/2/2008, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:40:20PM -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:Problem resolved?https://www.sprint.net/cogent.php
Since there is active litigation going on over this, it's also possible an attorney said, "hmmm... maybe you should wait until the judge has rendered an opinion -- and they got to their temporary re-establishment." I haven't looked, and don't know if I have access, to the court's motions/filings on this matter. Deepak
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?, (continued)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? James Hess (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Paul Vixie (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Florian Weimer (Nov 03)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Randy Epstein (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 02)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Randy Epstein (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Daniel Senie (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Paul Vixie (Nov 03)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Martin Hannigan (Nov 03)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Deepak Jain (Nov 03)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 02)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Mike Lyon (Nov 04)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Mark Foster (Nov 05)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Jasper Bryant-Greene (Nov 05)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 05)