nanog mailing list archives
Re: amazonaws.com?
From: Barry Shein <bzs () world std com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 14:14:38 -0400
If I may be so bold as to summarize a few posts: It's ok to let spammers and other criminals use your systems (e.g., compute clouds) to slam others just so long as you get yourself into the various blacklists. But I thought (routed) bandwidth was the ISP's stock in trade? And trust (e.g., whaddya think of people who hijack IP blocks?) I don't think it's ok for someone to be slamming my bandwidth and computrons, even at the firewall. As was mentioned some of these clouds are looking at multiple 10gb connections. Just because I can fend off seeing their content at my end doesn't mean I'm not being damaged. I have to keep up with their bandwidth and firewall computron usage, and managing usage of the blacklists. That's damages. -- -Barry Shein The World | bzs () TheWorld com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Login: Nationwide Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
Current thread:
- Re: amazonaws.com?, (continued)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Chris Stone (May 23)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Steve Atkins (May 23)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Colin Alston (May 24)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Kee Hinckley (May 24)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Christopher Morrow (May 24)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 24)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Seth Mattinen (May 24)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 24)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Colin Alston (May 25)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 25)
- Message not available
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 26)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Colin Alston (May 26)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 26)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Colin Alston (May 26)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 26)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Colin Alston (May 24)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Dorn Hetzel (May 26)
- RE: amazonaws.com? michael.dillon (May 27)