nanog mailing list archives
RE: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network
From: "Jason J. W. Williams" <williamsjj () digitar com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 10:29:33 -0600
I'm subscribed to both now. ;-) The advantage to the NANOG subject header was obviously it was resilient to e-mail address changes for the list. A nice attribute given e-mails now come in from both nanog () nanog org and nanog () merit edu addresses. Anyhow, I assume there was compelling reason for the change. -J --- Jason J. W. Williams COO/CTO, DigiTar http://www.digitar.com E: williamsjj () digitar com V: 208-343-8520 M: 208-863-0727 F: 208-322-8520 XMPP: williamsjj () digitar com -----Original Message----- From: Sam Stickland [mailto:sam_mailinglists () spacething org] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 7:59 AM To: Joe Abley Cc: nanog; nanog-futures Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Joe Abley wrote:
On 22 May 2008, at 23:16, James R. Cutler wrote:The announcement was made to nanog-announce, but not to nanog. I would expect that there are scads more readers of nanog than of nanog
announce.When I was sending things to nanog-announce, it was the case that mail
to nanog-announce was sent to people who had specifically subscribed to that list, plus anybody who hadn't but who was subscribed to nanog (in other words, it was sent to the union of both lists). That might have changed since the transition to mailman. It seemed like a useful approach, though.
Kinda makes you wonder what the purpose on the announce list is though. Are there actually people subscribed to nanog-annouce that aren't subscribed to nanog? Sam !SIG:4836ce2871591551116042!
Current thread:
- Re: Hughes Network, (continued)
- Re: Hughes Network Jim Popovitch (May 22)
- RE: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 22)
- RE: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 22)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Jim Popovitch (May 22)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network James R. Cutler (May 22)
- nanog / nanog-announce subs (was Re: Announce list: Re: Hughes Network) Philip Smith (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Joe Abley (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Sam Stickland (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Marshall Eubanks (May 23)
- RE: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Jim Popovitch (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Robert E. Seastrom (May 23)
- RE: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Security Admin (NetSec) (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Owen DeLong (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Joe Warren-Meeks (May 22)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? david raistrick (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Seth Mattinen (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Sean Figgins (May 21)