Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI?

[Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl () asgaard org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greetings,

Interesting comment Paul.  However, 16e and evdo are a "bit" heavy  
with infrastructure to support mobility.  Before giving that answer,  
you may want to ask Deepak if he NEEDS mobility....

        Chris

On 16 May 2008, at 10.23, Paul Wall wrote:

> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net> wrote:
> > Are there any good (published) BCPs for building out Municipal WiFi
> > networks? Particularly in the security/authentication/scaling areas?
>
> BCP #58,271,432--which basically states "Don't," comes highly  
> recommended.
>
> Instead, investigate your nearest .16e or evdo rev. A reseller. In the
> case of .16e, most available APN's are built around user and
> transport/transit abstractions, assuming shared-facilities, virtual
> providers, etc. The equipment used in both is a far cry from anything
> 802.11.
>
> p.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> NANOG () nanog org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

- ---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCB67593B




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJILcx7AAoJEGmx2Mt/+Iw/20UIAJjNOQ7JSbE8/iqGbuFZPEVX
AvQ/eRPHT6BhLXNSg5WZiL4aQcDeLhkMYwhpJTMkslHg5hveQHN/pUQB9pkMeqCZ
jffRbiKDzypaDf8q/Rx1vORO/bnQ4R27AfeKDc75Z07YewdBa9PKZz2EgsjVHQmp
FNDq9dVDWAI+scK3BFNge+QNeXatYUf0gP+LnRmNaPu+KZBThjD+Wmd6FWlfmuRa
GxvTOrESrbhRxrnF128B5RXa/GBohduiql1jrU0phb6w2a/NJbd+a4yvHANZpBHk
fwU3BrZKLixRtOOM3uA4ZPgliTUO/lD4tpW8SEWnvluhRe1tTIrmgf4qjxit5gA=
=z83n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog