[NANOG] IPv6 Alcatel-Lucent 7750 + Cisco 6509

[Nicolas Antoniello <nantoniello () antel net uy>]

By the way, to add some IPv6 technical noise:

Have you ever tried to set up MD5 auth. in a BGP over IPv6 session between an Alcatel 
7750SR and a Cisco 6500... I keep getting a log message (Cisco) exposing some issue with 
the MD5 digest from the Alcatel.
The funny thing is that Cisco <---> Cisco goes Fine, and Alcatel <---> Alcatel goes fine 
(as obviously expected)... so may be you know something about any difference in the 
implementation.
Even more "funny" is the fact that BGP MD5 auth. Cisco <---> Alcatel goes perfect over IPv4.

I'm also looking at some kind of issue like changes in TCP sequence numbers after MD5 hash 
or such things, but I found nothing yet...

I've talk to Alcatel, but no answer yet...

Thx,

Nic.



michael.dillon () bt com wrote:
> > <vendor ears == ON>  Hopefully...  ;-)
>
> Not likely! This is a motley crew of people who like to jabber,
> not a forum for your favorite vendor's customer support.
>
> > I want to be able to carry IPv6 in a VPRN without having to 
> > pay an order of magnitude more for an IOM.
>
> May I suggest that you will make much more impact on your vendor's
> radar if you explicitly ask your vendor rep for this feature, in
> writing. And then proceed to try setting up IPv6 in a VPRN as
> a lab experiment, then raise cases with your vendor's TAC when you
> run across problems. Tell them that you are doing the lab work as
> the first phase to commercial introduction of IPv6 services.
>
> One reason that IPv6 support is in a sorry state is that people
> try something, find it doesn't work, and then suffer in silence.
> Please do not suffer in silence! Please do explicitly tell people
> about the specific issues that you encounter and please do name
> names. Tell us which vendor, which device, which software release,
> etc. etc. yadda yadda boom!
>
> The more talk there is about IPv6, the more it gets on vendor radar 
> and the quicker they will fix problems and improve support. And don't
> forget all those vendors of NMS and OSS software.
>
> --Michael Dillon
>
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> NANOG () nanog org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog