![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Customer-facing ACLs
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:12:30 -0800
Dave Pooser wrote:
To me there is no question of whether or not you filter traffic for residential broadband customers.SBC in my area (Dallas) went from wide open to outbound 25 blocked by default/opened on request. I think doing the same thing with port 22 would
also people who do real work...
hardly be an undue burden on users, and would help keep botnets in check.
it would cause me to be a customer of a different service.
Current thread:
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs, (continued)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Dan Armstrong (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Robert Beverly (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Danny McPherson (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Mark Tinka (Mar 08)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Jo Rhett (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Christopher Morrow (Mar 11)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Scott Weeks (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Dave Pooser (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Joel Jaeggli (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Scott Weeks (Mar 07)
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Carpenter, Jason (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Dave Pooser (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Andy Dills (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Dave Pooser (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Mark Foster (Mar 07)
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Frank Bulk (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Joel Jaeggli (Mar 07)
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Frank Bulk - iNAME (Mar 08)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 08)