nanog mailing list archives

RE: Customer-facing ACLs


From: Tim Sanderson <tims () donet com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:48:23 -0500


We also use ingress bogon ACLs at our borders.

--
Tim Sanderson, network administrator
tims () donet com


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Justin Shore
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 3:20 PM
To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Customer-facing ACLs


Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:55:05 CST, Justin Shore said:

I'm assuming everyone uses uRPF at all their edges already so that
eliminates the need for specific ACEs with ingress/egress network
verification checks.

You're new here, aren't you? :)

Hopefully optimistic.  Don't bum me out going into a weekend...  :-)

 From the looks of my ingress BOGON ACLs on my borders (yes, I'm using
ACLs and not null routes for a reason) I'd most people not reading NANOG
(and maybe even some of them!) are not doing any ingress filtering on
their customer source IPs.  Sad....

Justin


Current thread: