nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10GE router resource
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:52:01 +0900
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008, Justin Shore wrote:
A computer running Linux is not a server. If it's job is to route and forward packets, then it is a router. And the fact that people are pushing the envelope at 10G is because Linux routers are already known to do a great job at 1G and below.Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should.
Hands up those of you running Cat6500's in service provider environments. Adrian
Current thread:
- RE: 10GE router resource, (continued)
- RE: 10GE router resource Lincoln Dale (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource Fred Reimer (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Adrian Chadd (Mar 25)
- RE: 10GE router resource Fred Reimer (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Chris Marlatt (Mar 27)
- RE: 10GE router resource michael.dillon (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Greg VILLAIN (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Mark Newton (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource michael.dillon (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Justin Shore (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Adrian Chadd (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Tore Anderson (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Robert Boyle (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Justin Shore (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource ann kok (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Chris Marlatt (Mar 27)
- Re: 10GE router resource Adrian Chadd (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource Ray Burkholder (Mar 26)
- RE: 10GE router resource michael.dillon (Mar 26)
- Message not available
- RE: 10GE router resource Robert Boyle (Mar 26)
- Re: 10GE router resource Mark Tinka (Mar 26)