nanog mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party network monitoring
From: "John A. Kilpatrick" <john () hypergeek net>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:10:45 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Tom Sands wrote:
When we did get a hold of someone, they mentioned they could support simple ICMP requests.
To them "simple" means it's just a ping check. They won't montior/graph/care about latency.
I was pondering creating a "smoke ping collective". Get a bunch of guys to agree to run smokeping and monitor each other. That's a great tool for visualizing changes in latency and works just as well with ICMP as with HTTP.
-- John A. Kilpatrick john () hypergeek net Email| http://www.hypergeek.net/ john-page () hypergeek net Text pages| ICQ: 19147504 remember: no obstacles/only challenges
Current thread:
- 3rd party network monitoring Darrell Hyde (Mar 04)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Drew Linsalata (Mar 04)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Matt Peterson (Mar 04)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Thomas Kuehling (Mar 05)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Tom Sands (Mar 05)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring John A. Kilpatrick (Mar 06)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jeroen Massar (Mar 06)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jason LeBlanc (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jason LeBlanc (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jeroen Massar (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jason LeBlanc (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jeroen Massar (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Tom Sands (Mar 05)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Eddy Martinez (Mar 05)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Matt (Mar 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Ethan Katz-Bassett (Mar 11)