nanog mailing list archives
Re: Kenyan Route Hijack
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:26:16 +0900
A popular reason from longer ago was enterprises that used arbitrary addresses for their internal networks, which was safe because they'd never be connected to the real internet. RFC1918 has made that problem mostly go away, but as recently as 1995 I had a customer who was a bank that was using University of Toronto IP addresses internally. We were working on their databases, not their networks, so while we strongly recommended they renumber some time soon, it wasn't happening during our project.
italian isps are notorious for using us military and other non-announced networks for infrastructure. i get a bit of a giggle out of it now. but boy was i shocked when i first did a traceroute from some public network in bologna years back. randy
Current thread:
- Routing Loop Felix Bako (Mar 14)
- RE: Routing Loop Darden, Patrick S. (Mar 14)
- Kenyan Route Hijack Danny McPherson (Mar 15)
- Re: Kenyan Route Hijack Danny McPherson (Mar 15)
- Re: Kenyan Route Hijack Glen Kent (Mar 15)
- Re: Kenyan Route Hijack Bill Stewart (Mar 15)
- Re: Kenyan Route Hijack Randy Bush (Mar 15)
- Re: Kenyan Route Hijack Danny McPherson (Mar 15)
- Re: Kenyan Route Hijack Adrian Chadd (Mar 15)
- Re: Kenyan Route Hijack Jeff Aitken (Mar 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Routing Loop Felix Bako (Mar 15)
- Re: Routing Loop Adrian Chadd (Mar 15)
- RE: Routing Loop Frank Bulk (Mar 15)
- RE: Routing Loop Robert D. Scott (Mar 15)
- Re: Routing Loop Felix Bako (Mar 15)
- RE: Routing Loop Robert D. Scott (Mar 15)
- Re: Routing Loop Dominic J. Eidson (Mar 15)
- Re: Routing Loop sthaug (Mar 15)
- Re: Routing Loop Adrian Chadd (Mar 15)