nanog mailing list archives
RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:50:52 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote:
Interestingly enough, when I trace from my Cisco router it seems to show some MPLS labels after the hop of interest (12.88.71.13 to 12.122.112.78, only 24 msec here!). I'm not sure how our Cisco box derives these from a foreign network.
The ICMP packet (TTL exceeded in transit) contains a copy of the packet which TTL expired, including the labels, so label information is available to traceroute.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency, (continued)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency James R. Cutler (Jun 26)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency John T. Yocum (Jun 26)
- RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 26)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency John T. Yocum (Jun 26)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 26)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Robert Richardson (Jun 26)
- RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 26)
- RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 26)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Warren Kumari (Jun 27)
- RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 26)
- RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 26)
- RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 26)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency Tim Peiffer (Jun 26)
- Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency bensons (Jun 26)