nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer
From: goemon () anime net
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Glen Turner wrote:
Then there's the deliberate nobbling of the TCP implementation, such as the restriction to ten of connections to Windows Xp SP3. Apparently you're meant to buy Windows Server if you are running P2P applications :-)
are you quite sure it is *10 tcp connections*? have you tested this? -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer, (continued)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Glen Turner (Jun 15)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Robert E. Seastrom (Jun 16)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Kevin Oberman (Jun 12)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Stuart Henderson (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Robert Boyle (Jun 12)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Kevin Oberman (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Robert Boyle (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Deepak Jain (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer goemon (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Glen Turner (Jun 15)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer goemon (Jun 16)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Bob Bradlee (Jun 16)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 22)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Kevin Oberman (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Kevin Oberman (Jun 13)
- comcast Thompson, Taeko (Jun 12)
- Re: comcast Matt Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: comcast Randy Bush (Jun 12)
- Re: comcast Steve Pirk (Jun 12)