nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:19:56 +0200
* Sean Donelan:
Any network with a large user population probably should have separate DNS servers for their authoritative zones answering the Internet at-large and their recursive resolvers serving their user population.
It's not so much a question of network size. You absolutely must use different views if you host DNS for customer domains because there is a race conidtion in the delegation provisioning protocol used by most TLDs (you need to add the domain before you receive the delegation).
Current thread:
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp, (continued)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Randy Bush (Jun 13)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Scott McGrath (Jun 14)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Jeroen Massar (Jun 14)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Scott McGrath (Jun 14)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Jeroen Massar (Jun 14)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Sean Donelan (Jun 14)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Mike Lewinski (Jun 14)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Nathan Ward (Jun 14)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Mark Andrews (Jun 15)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Michael Sinatra (Jun 15)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Randy Bush (Jun 13)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Florian Weimer (Jun 15)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Nathan Ward (Jun 14)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Scott C. McGrath (Jun 16)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Joe Greco (Jun 15)
- Re: DNS problems to RoadRunner - tcp vs udp Roland Dobbins (Jun 15)