nanog mailing list archives

Re: Analysing traces for performance bottlenecks


From: <rcheung () rochester rr com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:40:39 -0400

Wireshark can show the throughput on a bits/sec or pps, by IP, etc. This is under IO Graphs. You'll want to change the 
time display format of the main decode window to Seconds Since Beginning of Capture to sync up time with the graph.

At least that way, you can just focus on the dips in throughput in the graphs.


Rick
---- Kevin Oberman <oberman () es net> wrote: 
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:05:34 +0100
From: Sam Stickland <sam_mailinglists () spacething org>

Hi,

Are there any packages (or Wireshark options that I've missed) that can 
follow a TCP stream and determine the limiting factor on throughput. E.g 
Latency, packet loss, out of sequence packets, window size, or even just 
the senders rate onto the wire. I know how to analyse a trace by hand 
for performance issues, but it's relatively time consuming.

Googling for variations on "Analyse TCP stream limit throughput" didn't 
find anything.

tcptrace is old and pretty basic, but it can provide a LOT if
information. Combined with xplot, the graphs often point to the exact
nature of a TCP problem, but you need a really good understanding of TCP
to figure anything out.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman () es net                     Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751



Current thread: