nanog mailing list archives
RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 18:39:42 +0100
Pressure your local ICANN officers?Mmph. https://ns.iana.org/dnssec/status.html (it's out of ICANN's hands)
Huh!? Then what does this following statement refer to? (c) 2008 The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. I found that at the bottom of the IANA page whose URL you quoted. At the bottom of the IANA home page http://www.iana.org/ it is stated a bit more explicitly: IANA is operated by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers It sounds like ICANN has the matter well in hand to me given that it is only responsible for the common central bit of the DNS system. The rest of the job is everyone's problem. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning, (continued)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 08)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 09)
- RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Martin Hannigan (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Sean Donelan (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Joe Abley (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 09)
- RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning michael.dillon (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Leo Bicknell (Jul 10)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Randy Bush (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Randy Bush (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning David Conrad (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Randy Bush (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow (Jul 09)
- Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Martin Hannigan (Jul 09)