nanog mailing list archives

Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?


From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 02:02:19 -0500


On Jan 2, 2008 12:35 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
On Jan 1, 2008 12:46 PM, James Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:

The place where major problems could be run into is deciding how big a
block your ISPs and
LIRs get, or if the registries are entertaining the concept of  PI
space for v6.. how large

too late NRO policy comparison chart:

http://www.nro.net/documents/nro45.html#3-4-3


someone pointed out that the APNIC policy doc at:

http://www.apnic.net/policy/ipv6-address-policy.html

doesn't reflect the end-user PI assignment policy wording that appears
to be in the NRO link, perhaps someone from APNIC could clarify the
current state of affairs for us?

They also pointed out that I missed Afrinic in my listing... NRO
thinks that afrinic also does /48 end-user assignments... fyi.

Specifically APNIC and ARIN have /48 end-user assignments (PI)
policies in place, RIPE is still discussing this policy as of the last
meeting (if I recall correctly).



Current thread: