nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cox clamping VPN traffic?
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:49:30 -0600
It's been happening for a long time, and in many places. That's how companies like Sandvine, CacheLogic, and Allot stay in business. Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Tomas L. Byrnes Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 1:02 AM To: Justin M. Streiner; nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: Cox clamping VPN traffic? <snip> "....but my experience correlates with enough others to note that carriers are, stealthily, pushing out traffic shaping and rate limiting, sometimes with unintended consequences for non P2P services."
Current thread:
- Cox clamping VPN traffic? Tomas L. Byrnes (Jan 25)
- Re: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Jim Popovitch (Jan 25)
- RE: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Tomas L. Byrnes (Jan 25)
- RE: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 25)
- RE: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Tomas L. Byrnes (Jan 25)
- RE: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Frank Bulk (Jan 26)
- Re: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Matthew Moyle-Croft (Jan 25)
- RE: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Tomas L. Byrnes (Jan 25)
- Re: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Roland Perry (Jan 26)
- Re: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Jim Popovitch (Jan 25)
- Re: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Ben Scott (Jan 25)
- Re: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Mark Smith (Jan 25)
- Re: Cox clamping VPN traffic? Bill Nash (Jan 26)