nanog mailing list archives
Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal
From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy () center osis gov>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:22:35 -0500
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:49:48AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: ...
I wouldn't be suprised if in a few years some EU/US law mandates IP number portability, just like people have with their cellphones. Imagine what that will do to the routing tables. How many /32s can we get into the RIBs these days? :-)
And yet that is said to be one of the advantages of IPv6. -- Joe Yao Qinetiq NA / Analex Contractor
Current thread:
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal, (continued)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Hank Nussbacher (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Matt Palmer (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Roland Perry (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Andy Davidson (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Roland Perry (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Owen DeLong (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Roland Perry (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Roland Perry (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Jeff Shultz (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Joseph S D Yao (Jan 25)
- [admin] Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Martin Hannigan (Jan 25)
- Is 7bits enough? (was: Re: [admin] Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal) Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 26)
- Objection: RE: [admin] Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal michael.dillon (Jan 28)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Matt Palmer (Jan 24)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Tim Franklin (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Owen DeLong (Jan 25)
- Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal Roland Perry (Jan 25)