nanog mailing list archives
Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar?
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:58:19 +0530
I see roadrunner listens. frodo:~ dig +short houston.rr.com mx 0 . frodo:~ dig +short houston.rr.com txt "v=spf1 -all" --srs On Jan 13, 2008 8:55 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com> wrote:
A bunch of roadrunner subdomains migrated over to comcast and those are dud. One operationally better way to go seems to be Mark Delany's mx0dot proposal, which started out as an internet draft, but seems to have lost momentum .. the concept is sound though. http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-delany-nullmx That'd mean houston IN MX 0 . --srs On Jan 13, 2008 8:32 AM, Chris Boyd <cboyd () gizmopartners com> wrote:We're bouncing email to houston.rr.com due to the MX being set to localhost. clb@countzero:~$ host -t mx houston.rr.com houston.rr.com mail is handled by 10 localhost. Setting the MX to 127.0.0.1 seems like an odd way to handle the switch. <http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/silverman/4842611.html>
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar?, (continued)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Tony Finch (Jan 13)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 13)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Tony Finch (Jan 14)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 14)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Mark Andrews (Jan 14)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 14)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Mark Andrews (Jan 14)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Tony Finch (Jan 15)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Tony Finch (Jan 15)
- Re: houston.rr.com MX fubar? Tony Finch (Jan 13)