nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Filtering
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:18:38 -0500
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 04:11:36PM -0000, Ben Butler wrote:
As a transit consumer - why would I want to carry all this cr*p in my routing table, I would still be getting a BGP route to the larger prefix anyway - let my transit feeds sort out which route they use & traffic engineering.
Well, you could always just take "Customer" routes from each of your providers (since you're running BGP I presume you're actually multihomed and not adding to the pollution) and point default at one/both providers for the other networks (or take default from one or both of them). - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- BGP Filtering Ben Butler (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP Filtering Jared Mauch (Jan 15)
- RE: BGP Filtering Ben Butler (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP Filtering Joe Abley (Jan 15)
- RE: BGP Filtering Ben Butler (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP Filtering Dave Israel (Jan 15)
- RE: BGP Filtering Ben Butler (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP Filtering Dave Israel (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP Filtering William Herrin (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP Filtering Dave Israel (Jan 15)
- RE: BGP Filtering Ben Butler (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP Filtering Jared Mauch (Jan 15)
- Re: BGP Filtering Deepak Jain (Jan 15)
- RE: BGP Filtering Ben Butler (Jan 15)