nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC?
From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:43:30 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
2142 but i am surprised you asked here instead of an ietf list. here we
actually do the stuff, not tell other folk how they should do it. :)
Thanks for the pointer, and I even appreciate you snarky reply. :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHiaT9q1pz9mNUZTMRAsUwAKDfzxtwp/OLvLgl+xnO1lmMV7bcjACgzpAz bDJjr/2v8tbWJep9AIAfxkk= =Puaa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Randy Bush (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Christopher Morrow (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Steve Atkins (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Sean Donelan (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 13)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 14)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Christopher Morrow (Jan 12)
- Re[2]: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Leigh Porter (Jan 13)
- RE: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- RE: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Sean Donelan (Jan 13)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 13)
- RE: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Sean Donelan (Jan 13)