nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets.
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:38:57 -0500
"Wayne E. Bouchard" <web () typo org> writes:
So my oppinion is don't hesistate to use it until you find a real, reproducible problem.
Tell that to your call center manager. :-)
---rob
Current thread:
- Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Joshman at joshman dot com (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Joe Provo (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Jon Lewis (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Joe Provo (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Jon Lewis (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. JAKO Andras (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Jon Lewis (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 08)
- RE: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. David Schwartz (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. James R. Cutler (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Scott Weeks (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Joshman at joshman dot com (Jan 10)