nanog mailing list archives
Re: AboveNet Global Routing issue
From: Max Tulyev <president () ukraine su>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:56:08 +0200
Hi! The CIDR Report: Recent Table History Date Prefixes CIDR Agg 22-02-08 251555 162505 23-02-08 251796 163136 24-02-08 251963 163643 25-02-08 252045 163871 26-02-08 252278 159794 27-02-08 252472 158913 28-02-08 252993 159561 29-02-08 253399 160270 Can it be connected with some parts of Internet reached >256k prefixes (including internal)? :) Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:04:21PM -0500, John Dvorak wrote:Anyone aware if this is causing any bleedover to Sprint? Seeing massive delays (~280+ ms) and drops between Relay, MD (144.232.15.2) and San Jose (144.232.8.145).According to AboveNet, the routing instability has a temporary solution in place and they are working out the details of a permanent fix. Last I heard, they were planning on moving forward with the scheduled global backbone work that was set for this weekend.
-- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)
Current thread:
- AboveNet Global Routing issue Ross Vandegrift (Feb 28)
- Re: AboveNet Global Routing issue Rodrick Brown (Feb 28)
- RE: AboveNet Global Routing issue Blake Pfankuch (Feb 28)
- Re: AboveNet Global Routing issue Eric Brunner-Williams (Feb 28)
- Re: AboveNet Global Routing issue John Dvorak (Feb 28)
- Re: AboveNet Global Routing issue Ross Vandegrift (Feb 29)
- Re: AboveNet Global Routing issue Max Tulyev (Feb 29)
- Re: AboveNet Global Routing issue Eric Brunner-Williams (Feb 28)
- Re: AboveNet Global Routing issue Daniel Roesen (Feb 29)