nanog mailing list archives
RE: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking]
From: "Randy Epstein" <repstein () chello at>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:46:45 -0500
Valdis wrote:
He explicitly said "single-homed". Of course, multi-homed requires different handling, because you may hear their other home announce them (although again, you probably shouldn't listen to *THAT* announcement either if *your* link to them is up). And I posit that if you don't know if your customer is single or multi-homed, you have *bigger* issues to deal with.
My bad, I misread his multi-homed comment. From what I understand (and have seen in practice) PCCW does not listen to their address space from their peers no matter what the status of the connection to their customer is. I find this policy flat out flawed. Randy
Current thread:
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking, (continued)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Daniel Roesen (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Paul Wall (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Simon Leinen (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Hank Nussbacher (Feb 25)
- BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Pekka Savola (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Danny McPherson (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Pekka Savola (Feb 25)
- RE: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Randy Epstein (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 25)
- RE: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Randy Epstein (Feb 25)
- BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Pekka Savola (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP prefix filtering, how exactly? [Re: YouTube IP Hijacking] Arnd Vehling (Feb 26)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Andrew D Kirch (Feb 26)