nanog mailing list archives
Re: Repotting report
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:10:11 +0200 (EET)
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Leo Bicknell wrote:
may try "dig any . @[a-m].root-servers.net." When I do that, I get the following response: a, c, d e, f, g, i and j return 1 SOA, 8 A, and 3 AAAA's (the first 3). b, h, l, k, and m return 1 SOA, 13 A, no AAAA records. If you make this mistake you might think b, h, l, k and m have no IPv6 data, which is wrong. Querying with NS (as nameserver would do) clearly shows that. While a cosmetic problem, I fear it may confuse a number of admins as the troubleshoot problems in the near future.
It certainly will. Section 1.4 of RFC 4472 may be helpful here, though it mainly talks about this from the viewpoint of caching, not root servers.
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
Current thread:
- Repotting report Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Leo Bicknell (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Leo Bicknell (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Joe Abley (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Leo Bicknell (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report David Conrad (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Mark Andrews (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Kevin Loch (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Leo Bicknell (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Pekka Savola (Feb 04)
- Re: Repotting report Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Repotting report Mark Andrews (Feb 05)
- Re: Repotting report Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Repotting report Mark Andrews (Feb 05)
- Re: Repotting report John Payne (Feb 06)
- Re: Repotting report Mark Andrews (Feb 06)
- Re: Repotting report Leo Bicknell (Feb 04)