nanog mailing list archives
Re: an over-the-top data center
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:38:19 +0900
hint: your continued ad homina do not help your argument
By your logic, every IXP which has any participants is a good model and cannot be improved.
the criterion you set was success, not perfection. netnod is quite successful. is this discussion successful? i think not. good bye and good night. randy
Current thread:
- Re: an over-the-top data center Måns Nilsson (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Måns Nilsson (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Joe Provo (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Dec 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: an over-the-top data center Jeremy Jackson (Dec 01)