nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 08:27:05 -0500
For IS-IS, highly recommend MT to avoid any nasties while turning up v6 in a dual-stack environment.
as one who has been burned when topologies are not congruent, i gotta ask. if i do not anticipate v4 and v6 having different topologies, and all my devices are dual-capable, would you still recommend mt for other than future-proofing?
randy
Current thread:
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 devang patel (Dec 26)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 devang patel (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 28)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)