nanog mailing list archives
Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:20:44 -0500
On Dec 10, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Cvetan Ivanov wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:Is there some reason why 65000 is especially problematic ?65000 and above are private as numbers and should not be seen in the global table.
64512 & above. -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Andy Davidson (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Cvetan Ivanov (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Joe Abley (Dec 11)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 bill fumerola (Dec 11)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Cvetan Ivanov (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)