nanog mailing list archives
Re: Telecom Collapse?
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:34:01 -0600
David Cantrell wrote:
A "natural disaster prone location" would, by a normal person, be taken to be one where there is a high probability of being visited by nature's Fuckup Fairies. Such as flood plains (eg much of the Thames estuary) and the sides of active volcanoes (Naples). Most places have a very *low* probability of being visited by the fuckup fairy.
Yeah, I've been telling them for years that everyone should just vacate Oklahoma, and Kansas. Between tornados and severe storms, these states should be off limits. Of course, we all know people on the west coast are nuts. Must be the earthquakes shaking their brains around.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Telecom Collapse?, (continued)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Jack Bates (Dec 04)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Alex Rubenstein (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Chris Marlatt (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Alexander Harrowell (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Joe Abley (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Jack Bates (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? David Cantrell (Dec 05)
- RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: Telecom Collapse? Rod Beck (Dec 05)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Marshall Eubanks (Dec 05)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? David Cantrell (Dec 05)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Jack Bates (Dec 05)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Ben Scott (Dec 05)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Aaron Wendel (Dec 05)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Jeff Shultz (Dec 05)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Marshall Eubanks (Dec 05)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Skywing (Dec 05)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Michael Thomas (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Alexander Harrowell (Dec 04)
- RE: Telecom Collapse? Erik (Caneris) (Dec 04)
- Re: Telecom Collapse? Chris Marlatt (Dec 04)