nanog mailing list archives
Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6
From: Antonio Querubin <tony () lava net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:01:50 -1000 (HST)
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Charles Wyble wrote:
Forget about it on XP,Hmmm. MS says otherwise: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/ipv6/ipv6faq.mspx
None of the XP systems here (even with all the latest service packs installed) seem to do DHCPv6.
but it's in Vista. You can add it to BSD/Linux without too much trouble (are there good, bugfree implementations for those yet?)Bugfree? Nothing is bugfree :)
Indeed. The Vista client has some real problems with retaining DNS info. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN
Current thread:
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6, (continued)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Dale W. Carder (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 TJ (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Charles Wyble (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 TJ (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Sean Siler (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Charles Wyble (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Sean Siler (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Antonio Querubin (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Dale W. Carder (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Kevin Oberman (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Antonio Querubin (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 David W. Hankins (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 David W. Hankins (Aug 18)