nanog mailing list archives
Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake
From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:07:31 -0600
On Aug 14, 2008, at 10:59 PM, David Conrad wrote:
Yep. IANA does indeed have a limited operational role in the DNS (in that currently IANA directly operates .int, ip6.arpa, urn.arpa, uri.arpa, and iris.arpa) and no direct operational role in routing.Of course, the statement was about the authority and delegation model, not about operational roles....Not sure it is 'the most fundamental change', but it is indeed a significant change. That's sort of the point: RPKI is designed to allow for validation which isn't possible now....Indeed. And if RPKI is deployed in a way that is useful for validation of routing announcements in real time, this will obviously change, regardless of whether there is a single root for the address space or multiple roots. However, it seems to me that the decision as to whether there is a single root or multiple roots is deeply rooted (pun intended) in layer 9.But perhaps that's just me.
OK, so we were talking past one another. I agree with everything you said above, and simply meant to highlight the fact that RPKI validation will change things (quite necessarily, IMO), and folks need to be paying attention to this. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake, (continued)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake Christian Koch (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake Christian Koch (Aug 14)
- RE: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake michael.dillon (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake brett watson (Aug 14)
- RE: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake Martin Hannigan (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake Anton Kapela (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake David Conrad (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake Danny McPherson (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake David Conrad (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake Danny McPherson (Aug 14)
- Validating rights to announce a prefix (was: Public shaming...) michael.dillon (Aug 15)
- Re: Validating rights to announce a prefix Robert Kisteleki (Aug 15)
- RE: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake michael.dillon (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake David Conrad (Aug 14)
- RE: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake michael.dillon (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake David Conrad (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake Jean-François Mezei (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake Danny McPherson (Aug 14)
- Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space bymistake Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 14)