nanog mailing list archives
Re: facebook worm
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 01:49:47 -0400
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM, brett watson <brett () the-watsons org> wrote:
On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front page of news.com reduces nanog's utility.As does the days and days of rehash of one of Gadi's postings.And all of this BS is even *more* off topic than folks are claiming Gadi's post was. This list goes off topic all the time, at least Gadi's post was technical.
Not only was his post technical, it was relevant to operator revenue. "Application" doesn't take these calls, the network operators do. I can't think of a more relevant NANOG post of late. Saving us a headache by predefining an issue seems quite on topic to me. FWIW. YMMV. -M< [ No offense towards "Application" intended.]
Current thread:
- facebook worm Gadi Evron (Aug 06)
- Re: facebook worm Paul Wall (Aug 07)
- Re: facebook worm Gadi Evron (Aug 07)
- Re: facebook worm William Allen Simpson (Aug 08)
- Re: facebook worm Patrick Giagnocavo (Aug 08)
- Re: facebook worm Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Aug 08)
- Re: facebook worm brett watson (Aug 08)
- Re: facebook worm Martin Hannigan (Aug 08)
- Re: facebook worm Gadi Evron (Aug 08)
- Re: facebook worm n3td3v (Aug 08)
- Re: facebook worm Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 15)
- Re: facebook worm Kelvin Chu (Aug 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: facebook worm MTormey (Aug 08)
- Re: facebook worm Paul Ferguson (Aug 08)