nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
From: Marc Manthey <marc () let de>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:48:00 +0200
Am 29.04.2008 um 18:31 schrieb Jorge Amodio:
besides the multicast argument,
hi Jorge , all ok, i was talking about a "campus" installation imagine you want to broadcast a live event so 10.000 unicast streams and 10.000 multicast stream for example. from what toni replyed , you need less horsepower with the multicast streams
For 10000 concurrent unicast streams you'd need not just more servers.
but would like to know how this could be calculated. my 00.2 ;) marc - Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment Marc Manthey - Hildeboldplatz 1a D - 50672 Köln - Germany Tel.:0049-221-3558032 Mobil:0049-1577-3329231 jabber :marc () kgraff net blog : http://www.let.de ipv6 http://www.ipsix.org Klarmachen zum Ändern! http://www.piratenpartei-koeln.de _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?, (continued)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Joel Jaeggli (Apr 27)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Marc Manthey (Apr 26)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Antonio Querubin (Apr 27)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Marc Manthey (Apr 27)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Joel Jaeggli (Apr 27)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Dale Carstensen (Apr 28)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Jim Popovitch (Apr 28)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Frank Bulk - iNAME (Apr 28)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Williams, Marc (Apr 28)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Marc Manthey (Apr 29)