nanog mailing list archives
Re: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:40:19 +0800
On Wednesday 02 April 2008, David Freedman wrote:
We have dedicated VPNv4 route reflectors, they work well for us.
An inevitable end as the number of routes grows. That said, RFC 4684 would appear to be the ultimate solution, although vendor support is not rife at the moment. Cheers, Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling David Freedman (Apr 01)
- Re: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- RE: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling David Freedman (Apr 04)
- Re: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling Mark Tinka (Apr 04)
- RE: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling David Freedman (Apr 04)
- RE: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling David Freedman (Apr 04)
- Re: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: L3VPN VPNv4 NLRI - Route Reflector Scaling david . freedman (Apr 04)