nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:37:50 -1000
The model isn't very new at all.
no it isn't. many of us remember atm-1, so atm-2 is no big surprise. randy
Current thread:
- NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Durand, Alain (Sep 28)
- RE: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) michael.dillon (Sep 28)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Alain Durand (Sep 28)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 29)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 29)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 29)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 29)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Per Heldal (Sep 30)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 30)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- RE: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) michael.dillon (Sep 28)