nanog mailing list archives
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:16:35 -1000
To me, the idea that the previous phase is over and we're in a new phase is a positive statement, not a negative one.
being an engineer, i will judge by results. but the track record is not impressive. randy
Current thread:
- Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 25)
- Re: Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) bmanning (Sep 25)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 26)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 26)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 26)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 26)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jari Arkko (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jari Arkko (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 26)
- Re: Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) bmanning (Sep 25)