nanog mailing list archives

Re: Apple Airport Extreme IPv6 problems?


From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:39:17 +0200


For a production service, I will never use dual naming for IPv4 and IPv6, is
ridiculous ask the users to understand if they want to use one or the other
to use a different name. For a testing, not an issue.

Regards,
Jordi




De: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com>
Responder a: <owner-nanog () merit edu>
Fecha: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:06:25 -0400
Para: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
CC: Barrett Lyon <blyon () blyon com>, <nanog () merit edu>
Asunto: Re: Apple Airport Extreme IPv6 problems?


On 9/15/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com> wrote:
On 15-sep-2007, at 21:25, Barrett Lyon wrote:

The other thought that occurred to me, does FF/Safari/IE have any
ability to default back to v4 if v6 is not working or behaving
badly?  This could be a helpful transition feature but may be more
trouble than it's worth.

Browsers are pretty good at falling back on a different address in
general / IPv4 in particular when the initial try doesn't work, but
it does take too long if the packet is silently dropped somewhere. If
there is an ICMP unreachable there is no real delay. Worst case is a
path MTU discovery black hole, then browsers generally don't fall back.

Getting back to my original discussion with Barrett, what should we do
about naming? I initially though that segregating v6 in a subdomain
was a good idea, but if this is truly a migration, v4 should be the
interface segregated.

 I have also read Jordi? saying that no dual naming should occur, but
I think this is unrealistic. (Sorry if I misquoted you, Jordi)

It would be good if more ISPs deployed 6to4 gateways so the 6to4
experience would be better.

We are. There are an unending supply of small details that are in the
way at the moment. :-)

Best,

Marty




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.




Current thread: