nanog mailing list archives

RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter


From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:18:00 +0100



Has everyone forgotten the "Tier 1 depeerings" of several 
years ago?  i.e. 
If you were pointing default at C&W, PSINet, Cogent, or 
Level3 when they each had or caused depeering issues, parts 
of the internet ceased to be reachable.  In such cases, 
having full routes from multiple providers was the only way 
to be automatically protected from such games.

Not so. Anyone who had sufficient transit was also protected from
the games. Lots of so-called regionals and tier-2 networks were 
shielded from this monkey-business. And, of course, they shielded
their customers as well. A tier-1 network operator who operates such
a fragile network becomes a single point of failure. And not just
because of peering as the AT&T frame relay collapse shows.

--Michael Dillon


Current thread: