nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
From: Matt Liotta <mliotta () r337 com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:14:23 -0400
Jon Lewis wrote:
Do you know in what version this behavior was changed? At the very least, people are going to want to upgrade IOS, as it'll likely mean the difference between slightly increased MSFC CPU and a switch that can't cope.I looked at the IOS version I ran the test on it was quite old (12.1). I am happy to rerun the test with other versions of IOS. Any suggestions?
-Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Yahoo! Mail/Sys Admin, (continued)
- Re: Yahoo! Mail/Sys Admin Al Iverson (Sep 24)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 23)
- pointing default (was Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter) Randy Bush (Sep 23)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter John A. Kilpatrick (Sep 21)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter James Jun (Sep 22)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter micky coughes (Sep 22)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter James Jun (Sep 22)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter John A. Kilpatrick (Sep 25)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Lincoln Dale (Sep 21)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 21)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Matt Liotta (Sep 21)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Lincoln Dale (Sep 21)