nanog mailing list archives
Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd)
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 02:53:36 +1200
On 5/09/2007, at 8:52 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
P.S. I'm writing this from behind a monopoly ISP who deliberately blocks all proto 41 traffic, and thus 6to4, so I have no idea what content, if any, the Experiment is actually providing... Anyone want to give me a Teredo relay for "research" purposes? :)
Luckily for you, the relay that is used isn't something you get to decide - the far end (in this case, the IPv6 experiment's servers) chose the relay based on their best path to 2001::/32.
The bit you can chose is a Teredo /server/ - luckily, there are several living servers, open to the world. They should all work just fine for you, unless someone is blocking the Teredo port.
Unluckily, there's no content there. "Yet" - it's been "yet" for about a year now.
-- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Gadi Evron (Sep 04)
- Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Petri Helenius (Sep 04)
- Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Deepak Jain (Sep 04)
- Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Stephen Sprunk (Sep 05)
- Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Jeroen Massar (Sep 05)
- Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Kevin Day (Sep 05)
- Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Nathan Ward (Sep 08)
- Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Deepak Jain (Sep 04)
- Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd) Petri Helenius (Sep 04)