nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:03:03 -0400
On 10/26/07, Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote: [ snip ]
--- davidu () everydns net wrote: From: David Ulevitch <davidu () everydns net> Often times when I get these (and it's pretty often) I just take their email address and add it to my list of people we send out RFQs to.
[..and.. ]
You obviously haven't had the experiences that some have had with sales folks that use >this method. Some are like the little Chihuahua that won't quit trying to hump your leg. >No matter how many times you tell them you're not going to "do it" they keep trying.
The AUP that we ( the NANOG MLC) presented to the "community" at NANOG 41, which seemed to have wide support, contained a new provision to deal with this problem. Hopefully, the "steering" committee will step up to the plate and approve soon. -M<
Current thread:
- OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel Scott Weeks (Oct 26)
- Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel Bill Nash (Oct 26)
- Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel John Kinsella (Oct 26)
- Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel Tim Yocum (Oct 26)
- Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel Dave Pooser (Oct 26)
- Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel Martin Hannigan (Oct 27)
- RE: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel Sherry Ollins (Oct 27)
- Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel Bill Nash (Oct 26)