nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco outage
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:36:05 -0500
On Nov 27, 2007 8:18 AM, J. Oquendo <sil () infiltrated net> wrote:
Martin Hannigan wrote:Can someone please indirectly email Mr. Oquendo and advise him that we would like to have a word with him? He seems to have blocked Google and has made us unable to have a chat.Blocked Google? Strange I got this message. But since you wanted to direct this back to the list when I responded to you, let me level the playing ground and post my direct response to you. Since after all I did follow procedures and leave it off the list.
I received the following message when I responded to your complaint related to my first note, which you opted to post to the list.
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: sil () infiltrated net Technical details of permanent failure: PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 13): 554 Service unavailable; Client host [209.85.198.190] blocked using ubl.unsubscore.com; Sender has sent to LashBack Unsubscribe Probe accounts
Let me repost my response to your complaint, which it appears you may not have gotten: --begin We do have people "bitching" when they are asked to be more on-topic, much like people bitch when they get speeding tickets. They seem to "slow down" after our requests and are remarkably on topic. 4. Postings that include foul language, character assassination, and lack of respect for other participants are prohibited. 6. Postings of political, philosophical, and legal nature are prohibited. We could take a drive down Warning St. if you like, but we prefer to point out things without warnings and suggest voluntary compliance instead of arm twisting with warnings. It's your choice, not ours. --end Let me reiterate that my motivation was my interpretation of your conduct on the list previously as being fairly non contributory and combative, as demonstrated above. It's certainly ok for you to disagree. I welcome it so that we can attempt to make the list better. That does not mean that you are correct. Your belief that my interpretation is incorrect, and open for debate, is noted and will be taken up with a higher power at a later date. Best Regards, Martin Hannigan NANOG MLC Member
Current thread:
- Cisco outage J. Oquendo (Nov 26)
- Re: Cisco outage Martin Hannigan (Nov 26)
- Re: Cisco outage Randy Bush (Nov 27)
- Re: Cisco outage Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Cisco outage Jim Popovitch (Nov 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cisco outage J. Oquendo (Nov 27)
- Re: Cisco outage Martin Hannigan (Nov 27)
- Re: Cisco outage Martin Hannigan (Nov 26)