Re: [NANOG-Admins] Options et. al. on admins@ list

["Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>]

That would be a 'whoops!, wrong list!', folks. The context is
contained here, as in 'regular meetings' of the MLC:

http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0710/presentations/mailinglist.pdf

If anyone had some suggestions for next months agenda, be happy to
take them off-list. :-)

Apologies for the misfire!


-M<



On Nov 14, 2007 7:23 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com> wrote:
> They're not points, Alex. They should be agenda items.
>
>
> On Nov 14, 2007 7:13 PM, Alex Pilosov <alex () pilosoft com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Marty, I'll bring both points up.
> >
> > -alex
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >
> > > Folks:
> > >
> > > We should be able to see subscribers to admins so that we know who is
> > > on the list. Can we get a current listing so that we can see who is
> > > receiving our mail?
> > >
> > > We should also use Merit's conference bridge if it's toll-free. We pay
> > > for this stuff through our fees so we should not be tied to a members
> > > service since it could be disrupted if that person does not attend or
> > > is no longer on the MLC.
> > >
> > > Also, proposals
> > >
> > > Meeting Etiquette:
> > >
> > > Roberts Rules of Order
> > > Quorum: 51% or more, depending upon membership make up.
> > > Required to hold official Meeting: majority of voting members (4 as of current)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. Adding people to admins () nanog org
> > >
> > > When an individual is being proposed to be added to the MLC mailing
> > > list, the proppsal will be discussed on admins () nanog org. In the event
> > > of any objection, the issue will be discussed and voted on at the next
> > > MLC call.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Admins mailing list
> > > Admins () nanog org
> > > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/admins